Dating as a Signaling Game

From Tinder bios to first-date outfits — the information we (intentionally or not) transmit.

In the strange theatre of modern dating, everyone is performing — not just to impress, but to signal. We're sending subtle messages about who we are, what we value, and what kind of future we might offer. Swipe through any dating app and you'll see a parade of carefully selected photos, curated bios, and coded language. This isn't deception; it's strategy. And it's best understood through the lens of game theory — specifically, the signaling game.

The Game Beneath the Game

In game theory, a signaling game involves two types of players: those who have private information (about themselves) and those trying to infer that information based on observable signals.

A classic example is the peacock: its bright, heavy tail doesn't directly aid survival, but it signals to potential mates that the peacock is strong and healthy enough to carry it anyway — a costly signal, and therefore a reliable one.

Humans are no different. In dating, you can't immediately see someone's emotional stability, long-term intentions, or capacity for empathy. So we signal. We present ourselves in ways designed to suggest those qualities. And like any strategic game, both sides know what the other is doing — which leads to escalating levels of interpretation, calibration, and (sometimes) misfire.

Curated Selves: The New Courtship Display

Take a typical dating app profile. Every element is a signal, deliberate or not:

• Photos:

  • A solo picture at Machu Picchu signals adventure and financial flexibility.
  • A dog pic signals warmth.
  • A gym selfie signals health and discipline — or, depending on context, vanity.

• Bios:

  • A short quote might signal wit.
  • A reference to books or politics might signal intelligence or values alignment.
  • Even "no hookups" is a signal — whether of seriousness, boundary-setting, or even pre-emptive defensiveness.

None of these things are proof of underlying traits. But they're proxies. And because the "audience" knows this, the game becomes recursive: people signal knowing they're being interpreted. "Authenticity," ironically, becomes one of the most coveted — and gamed — signals.

Cheap Talk vs. Costly Signals

Not all signals are equal. In game theory, cheap talk refers to signals that cost the sender nothing and are therefore easy to fake.

Saying "I'm looking for something serious" means little unless backed by costly actions — like:

• Prioritizing quality conversations over endless swiping
• Making time for consistent dates
• Respecting boundaries and time
• Demonstrating consistent emotional presence
• Making future-oriented plans

These signals take effort, vulnerability, and intention. That's what gives them weight.

When Everyone Over-Signals

In highly competitive dating markets — big cities, apps with asymmetric gender ratios — signaling arms races emerge. Everyone polishes their profiles. Everyone tries to stand out.

But if everyone claims to be "funny, smart, down-to-earth," those signals lose meaning. We approach an equilibrium where the signals are too noisy to trust.

This leads to second-order strategies: instead of just signaling good traits, daters start signaling signal literacy — subtle indicators that they know the game and play it well.

A low-effort bio like "Here for the dog pics" might be a deliberate rejection of over-signaling — itself a kind of signal.

Choosing the Right Game

Game theory doesn't just describe systems; it helps us ask whether we want to be part of them.

Dating apps are built on rapid impressions and algorithmic filtering — games optimized for short-term engagement, not necessarily long-term connection. But humans don't always play by platform logic. Some opt out. Some find niche communities. Some change their own signaling strategy entirely.

The truth is, every interaction is a signal — even silence. And every signal invites interpretation, fair or not.

But understanding the structure of the game lets you play more consciously. You can ask:

• What am I signaling — and to whom?
• Are my signals honest, or just strategic?
• What signals am I drawn to — and are they reliable?

---

Dating isn't just chemistry. It's strategy.
And sometimes, winning the game starts with rewriting the rules.